Strengthening implementation consistency of PS V3 Criterion 9.8: Six key insights

Strengthening implementation consistency of PS V3 Criterion 9.8: Six key insights

In this episode of the ASI podcast series, ASI Educational Manager Rhiannon Prescott is joined by ASI CEO Fiona Solomon to unpack the results of ASI’s recent OECD alignment assessment—and what it means in practice for ASI Auditors and Members. The discussion explores ASI’s pathway towards recognition as a ‘Track A Standard’ under the London Metal Exchange responsible sourcing requirements, including the two-stage OECD alignment assessment process and key findings from independent review. While ASI was found to be aligned in practice, six areas of partial alignment highlight opportunities to strengthen consistency in implementation—particularly through improved understanding of expectations under Criterion 9.8. Key topics covered include: * Why Criterion 9.8 is unique within the ASI Performance Standard and closely aligned with the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Due Diligence Guidance * Why due diligence applies to all supply chains—including simple or vertically integrated ones * The role (and limits) of ASI Chain of Custody certification in meeting OECD Step 1C requirements * How complaints mechanisms act as early warning systems for supply chain risks * What “mapping red-flagged supply chains” really means in practice for upstream and downstream entities * Why aluminium smelters are a critical focus under OECD Step 4 audits This episode emphasises that due diligence is an ongoing process—requiring continuous learning, improved supply chain visibility, and collective effort across the aluminium value chain. 🔗 Learn more about ASI Standards and responsible sourcing: https://aluminium-stewardship.org